新研究成果可能会让此景成为现实:英国超市的购物者很快就能在购买食品前,查看食品对环境造成的影响。科学家已能利用公共数据库估算出成千上万种食品的构成及其对环境的影响。
The researchers estimated the composition of thousands of foods from the ingredients lists on their packaging. They then assessed their effect on the environment – the greater the impact, the higher the score.
研究人员根据食品包装上的成分表估算了成千上万种食品的构成。然后,他们评估了食品对环境造成的影响——影响越大,分数越高。
Fizzy drinks have the least effect, typically scoring 0.23 in the analysis. Ready meals were 3.17, tea was higher at 5.44. But unsurprisingly, the more meat and dairy, the greater the impact. Most foods were dwarfed by lamb and beef, which scored 34.
碳酸饮料对环境的影响最小,在分析报告中的评分通常为0.23。方便速食的分数为3.17,茶类分数更高,为5.44。但不出所料的是,食品中肉类和乳制品含量越高,其对环境的影响就越大。羊肉和牛肉的分数为34,大大高于多数食品。
Crucially though, the researchers found significant variations within the same foods. For example, the score for the worst pork sausages was 30% higher than the best. And the impact of biscuits depended on the amount of chocolate they contained. The worst was 46% higher than a plain biscuit.
但关键是,研究人员发现同类食物不同商品对环境的影响存在显著的差异。例如,评分最差的猪肉香肠比最好的分数高出30%。饼干对环境的影响取决于饼干中巧克力的含量。评分最差的饼干比普通饼干的分数高出46%。
The researchers found similar trends for pesto sauces and lasagne, suggesting that there’s scope for manufacturers to make a big difference with small changes to their recipes.
研究人员在香蒜酱和意式千层面中发现了类似的趋势,这表明食品制造商有机会通过微调配方带来重大的环保效益。
词汇表
composition 构成,成分
ingredients (食品)成分,原料
assessed 评估了
fizzy drinks 碳酸饮料
ready meals 方便食品,即食食品
dwarfed 相形见绌
significant 显著的
pork sausages 猪肉香肠
pesto sauces 香蒜酱
lasagne 意式千层面
scope (做事的)余地,机会
阅读理解:请在读完上文后,回答下列问题。
1. According to this new research, what did a higher score on food composition mean?
2. Which types of food had the highest score?
3. True or false? The score for sausages depended on their quality.
4. How could food manufacturers change their impact on the environment?
答案
1. According to this new research, what did a higher score on food composition mean?
A higher score meant a bigger impact on the environment.
2. Which types of food had the highest score?
Lamb and beef had the highest score at 34.
3. True or false? The score for sausages depended on their quality.
True. The score for the worst pork sausages was 30% higher than the best.
4. How could food manufacturers change their impact on the environment?
The research suggested there’s scope for manufacturers to make a big difference with small changes to their recipes.
内容简介 想在口语中传达 “谁也说不准” 这个意思时,人们常用 “there's no saying/telling/knowing…”,意思就是 “谁也没法知道……”。除此之外,还有哪些短语和搭配具有相同或类似的含义?听节目,跟主持人 Beth 和步理学习如何用英语表达 “谁也说不准”。 文字稿 (关于台词的备注: 请注意这不是广播节目的逐字稿件。本文稿可能没有体现录制、编辑过程中对节目做出的改变。) BethHello…
内容简介 除了可以说 “I am about to succeed” 以外,还能如何表达 “我马上就要成功了”?本期节目中,主持人 Phil 和步理将辨析三个可以用于描述 “事物即将发生变化” 的表达:“on the verge…
内容简介 “Discreet” 和 “discrete” 这两个单词虽然具有完全不同的含义,拼法却十分接近,读音更是完全相同。那么我们该如何区分它们呢?在口语交流中,我们可以根据谈话的上下文和场景来辨别对方想要使用哪个单词;而在阅读和书写时,我们则需要注意区分这两个单词的拼写方式,避免在使用中混淆它们。听节目,跟主持人 Georgie 和步理一起学习单词 “discreet” 和 “discrete” 的用法。 文字稿 (关于台词的备注: 请注意这不是广播节目的逐字稿件。本文稿可能没有体现录制、编辑过程中对节目做出的改变。) Buli大家好,欢迎收听…
内容简介 单词前缀 “in-” 通常用于构成一个词的反义词。比如 “secure(安全的)” 和 “insecure(没有保障的,不安全的)”。不过,单词 “valuable” 和 “invaluable” 却不是一对反义词,并且它们的意思十分相近,都可以形容某物 “具有很高的价值”。那么这两个词究竟有什么不同呢?听节目,跟主持人 Beth 和步理辨析这对近义词。 文字稿…
内容简介 “Hard skills(硬技能)” 和 “soft skills(软技能)” 之间的区别真的在于 “硬度” 吗?其实不然。在个人发展和职场中,“hard skills” 通常指那些 “通过培训和学习获得的、可以用证书或学历证明的技能”,而 “soft skills” 则往往指的是…
内容简介 在英语中,我们可以用 “hardly any”、“barely any” 和 “scarcely any” 这三个搭配来表示 “几乎没有”。比如,“I think there is hardly any…